Citation

He, Y., Fong, G.T., Cummings, K.M., Hyland A., Freitas-Lemos, R., Shang, C. (2025). The Economic Factors that Determine Smoking Abstinence: A Survival and Mediation Analysis. International Journal of Drug Policy.doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104852.

Abstract

Background: Higher taxes stimulate quit attempts and higher rates of smoking abstinence. Additionally, taxes on tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes (ECs) may influence consumers’ perceptions of the relative costs of these products. Understanding the relationship between cigarette and EC taxes, cost perceptions, and smoking abstinence is therefore crucial.

Methods: This study utilized longitudinal data from the US arm of the 2016–2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) Surveys and implemented a survival analysis to explore the impact of cigarette and EC taxes on smoking abstinence. A mediation analysis was also performed to test whether the effects of taxes are influenced by individuals’ perceptions about the relative cost differences between ECs and cigarettes.

Results: A 10 % increase in cigarette taxes was associated with an 11.1 % increase in smoking abstinence. EC taxes were not associated with smoking abstinence among the overall sample. However, higher EC taxes were associated with greater odds of smoking abstinence among individuals over 40 and lower odds of smoking abstinence among individuals under 40. Relative cost perception did not mediate the effect of taxes on smoking abstinence. Additionally, the odds of quitting were higher among individuals in the high-income group and those who used ECs daily, and lower among individuals in older age groups.

Conclusions: Cigarette taxes have a direct impact on smoking abstinence, independent of cost perceptions. To enhance cessation rates, policymakers should implement targeted strategies such as increasing access to cessation programs, providing financial incentives for quitting, and tailoring tax policies to better support older individuals and those with lower incomes.

Citation

Tattan-Birch, H., East, K.A., Cox, S., Jackson, S., Brown, J., Simonavicius, E., Reid, J.L., Hammond, D., Taylor, E.V. (2025). Impact of standardising the colour and branding of vape devices on product appeal among young people: a randomised experiment in England, Canada, and the US. Tobacco Control, [Published online May 13, doi: doi:10.1136/tc-2024-059210].

Abstract

Objective

To estimate the impact of standardising the colour and branding of disposable vaping devices on young people’s interest in trying them.

Design, setting and participants

Data were from national surveys of 16–29-year-olds in Canada, England and the United States in 2023 (N=15?259).

Interventions

Respondents were randomised (1:1) to view images of either four branded disposable vapes (N=7638) or four standardised white disposable vapes (n=7621) and asked which they would be interested in trying.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was selecting “no interest in trying” rather than any of the vapes displayed. We also examined whether the impact of standardisation differed by five potential moderators. Results A greater proportion of participants reported “no interest in trying” the white standardised than branded vapes (67.1% vs 62.8%; adjusted risk ratio (ARR) 1.127, 95% CI 1.085 to 1.169). Compared with those who had never smoked or vaped, the impact of standardisation on those reporting no interest was greater for those who had, in the past 30 days, only smoked (47.5% vs 37.5%, ARR 1.287, 95% CI 1.079 to 1.495), only vaped (19.9% vs 16.4%, ARR 1.220, 95% CI 1.002 to 1.438), dual used (13.5% vs 9.5%, ARR 1.420, 95% CI 1.017 to 1.822) or who had formerly vaped/smoked (72.6% vs 65.0%, ARR 1.119, 95% CI 1.071 to 1.167). The impact was also greatest in the oldest age group, but there were no other clear moderators.

Conclusions

Standardising the colour and branding of disposable vaping devices reduces young people’s interest in trying them. However, this includes a substantial impact on those who smoke.

Citation

Hammond, D., Reid, J.L., Goniewicz, M.L., McNeill, A., O’Connor, R.J., Corsetti, D., Block, A.C., Brose, L.S., Robson, D. (2025). Nicotine exposure from smoking tobacco and vaping among adolescents. JAMA Network Open, 8(3), doi: doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62544.

Abstract

Importance

It remains unknown whether nicotine intake among youths who vape is lower, comparable, or higher than among youths who smoke.

Objective

To examine potential differences in biomarkers of exposure to nicotine (1) between adolescents who smoke tobacco, vape, both vape and smoke (dual use), or do not use; (2) between adolescents in 3 countries; and (3) by nicotine content and form in the vaping product last used among adolescents who exclusively vaped.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based, observational cross-sectional study invited adolescents aged 16 to 19 years in Canada, England, and the US who had previously completed national surveys to participate in a biomarker study based on their vaping and smoking status. Participants completed questionnaires and self-collected urine samples between September 2019 and January 2022. Analyses were conducted in February 2023 and between January and June 2024.

Exposures

Vaping, tobacco smoking, dual use, or no use in the past 7 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Urine concentration of cotinine, trans-3′-hydroxycotinine (3OH-cotinine), and total nicotine equivalents (TNE-2; molar sum of cotinine and 3OH-cotinine), normalized for creatinine concentration.

Results

Among the 364 participants (mean [SD] age, 17.6 [1.1] years; 203 females [55.8%]) who provided usable urine samples and completed questionnaires, no differences in TNE-2 concentration were observed between adolescents who exclusively vaped (n = 73; geometric mean [SD], 3.10 [16.69] nmol/mg creatinine), exclusively smoked (n = 68; geometric mean [SD], 3.78 [18.00] nmol/mg creatinine), or both vaped and smoked (n = 77; geometric mean [SD], 6.07 [19.08] nmol/mg creatinine) in the past week, adjusting for creatinine concentration, age, sex, country, and cannabis use. All vaping and/or smoking groups had higher concentrations of TNE-2 than no use (n = 146; geometric mean [SD], 0.19 [1.14] nmol/mg creatinine; P < .001 for all contrasts). Among adolescents who exclusively vaped (n = 73), TNE-2 concentrations were not significantly different between those who reported using products containing more than 20 mg/mL nicotine (n = 33; geometric mean [SD], 4.35 [18.25] nmol/mg creatinine) and containing 20 mg/mL nicotine or less (n = 28; geometric mean [SD], 5.13 [15.64] nmol/mg creatinine). Reported use of vaping products containing nicotine salts (n = 23) was associated with higher concentration of TNE-2 (geometric mean [SD], 10.78 [18.03] nmol/mg creatinine) than reported use of products without nicotine salts (n = 29; geometric mean [SD], 2.72 [15.42] nmol/ng creatinine; P = .03) or reporting “don’t know” (n = 14; geometric mean [SD], 1.55 [15.01] nmol/ng creatinine; P = .009). Similar patterns of exposure were observed for cotinine and 3OH-cotinine.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study found that vaping was associated with similar nicotine exposure as smoking among adolescents. Reported use of a nicotine salt product was associated with higher nicotine exposure among those who exclusively vaped, consistent with findings from laboratory and population studies indicating greater dependence for nicotine salt e-cigarettes.

Citation

Hammond, D., Reid, J.L., Goniewicz, M.L., McNeill, A., O’Connor, R.J., Corsetti, D., Brose, L.S., Schurr, B., Robson, D. (2025). Biomarkers of toxicant exposure among youth in Canada, England and the United States who vaped and/or smoke cigarettes or do neither. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.doi: doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1338.

Abstract

Background:

Few studies examine biomarkers of exposure to vaping and tobacco products among youth. We compared biomarkers for toxicants between youth who vape, smoke, 'dual-use', or neither.

Methods:

Participants aged 16-19 in Canada, England, and the United States (US) completed surveys and self-collected urine samples between September 2019 and January 2022 (N=364). Urine was tested for metabolites of tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNK and six volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Regression models examined differences in biomarker concentrations by past-week tobacco smoking and vaping, adjusting for creatinine, age, sex, country, and cannabis use.

Results:

Compared to no vaping/smoking, exclusive vaping was associated with similar exposure to acrolein and acrylonitrile, but higher exposure to toluene (p=.04) and acrylamide (p=.034, only in sensitivity analysis using past-24-hour measure). Compared to dual-use or exclusive smoking, exclusive vaping was associated with lower exposure to NNK, acrolein, acrylamide, and acrylonitrile (p≤.01), but higher toluene exposure than dual use (p=0.012). Exposure was similar for dual-use and exclusive smoking. Benzene and xylene biomarkers were detected in <5% and not compared. Among those smoking, NNK exposure was higher in the US (geometric mean=25.4pg/mg creatinine) versus Canada (16.1pg/mg; p=0.006) and England (14.1pg/mg; p=0.018).

Conclusions:

Youth exclusively vaping had similar exposure as no vaping/smoking except for two VOCs, and lower exposure than smoking or dual use except toluene. Higher NNK levels among US youth who smoke likely reflect differences in tobacco blend. Impact: Findings are generally consistent with literature indicating lower toxicant exposure from vaping versus smoking, but elevated exposure versus no use for some.

Citation

Hackworth, E., Vidaña-Pérez, D., O'Neal, R., Minji, K., Hammond, D., Thrasher, J.F. (2025). Trends in Mental Health Symptoms, Nicotine Product Use, and their Association Over Time Among Adolescents in Canada, England, and the US: Findings from the ITC Adolescents Tobacco and Vaping Survey, 2020- 2023. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, [Published online Jan 17, doi: DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaf015].

Abstract

Introduction: There is a well-established bi-directional relationship between cigarette smoking and internalizing mental health (IMH) symptoms (e.g., symptoms of depression, symptoms of anxiety). However, it is unclear whether IMH symptoms are associated with using different types or combinations of nicotine products (e.g., combustible, non-combustible, exclusive product use or multi-product use). The purpose of this study is to improve our understanding of the relationship between adolescent IMH symptoms and use of a wide variety of nicotine products by examining the association between IMH symptoms and current nicotine use from 2020-2023.

Methods: Data come from the 2020-2023 waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Adolescents Tobacco and Vaping Survey, an online repeat cross-sectional survey of adolescents aged 16-19 in Canada, England, and the US (n=80,427). Current nicotine use was examined in four categories: 1) no use, 2) exclusive non-combustible product use, 3) exclusive combustible product use, and 4) use of both product types. Respondents reported current symptoms of depression or anxiety, and we generated a dichotomous IMH symptoms variable (yes vs. no). We examined the association between IMH symptoms and current nicotine use using multinomial logistic regression models that adjusted for covariates.

Results: IMH symptoms were most strongly associated with use of both product types (adjusted relative risk ratio [ARRR]: 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-2.03), followed by exclusive non-combustible use (ARRR: 1.70, 95% CI=1.61-1.80), and then exclusive combustible use (ARRR: 1.29, 95% CI=1.21- 1.37).

Conclusions: Adolescents with IMH symptoms are more likely to use nicotine products in general than adolescents without IMH symptoms. Specifically, non-combustible product use may have a particularly strong relationship with poor mental health among adolescents. Longitudinal research is needed to better understand directionality.

Citation

Yong, H. H., Hughes, L., Borland, R., Gravely, S., Cummings, K.M., Brose, L.S., Taylor, E.V., Bansal-Travers, M., Hyland, A. (2025). Prevalence and correlates of negative side effects from vaping: Findings from the 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 226, doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112503.

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined prevalence and correlates of self-reported negative side effects from nicotine vaping product (NVP) use among people who currently or recently vape.

Methods: This crosssectional study analysed data from 3906 adults (aged 18+ years) from the 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey (Canada, US, England and Australia) who reported they had ever smoked cigarettes and were either currently vaping daily/weekly or had vaped in the last month. Participants were asked about experiencing and seeking medical advice for any negative side effects from vaping in the past month. Logistic regressions were used to estimate prevalence and identify correlates.

Results: Overall, 87.1 % reported no negative side effects from vaping. The most common side effects were throat irritation (5.8 %), cough (5.5 %), and mouth irritation (4.1 %). The top two that led to seeking medical advice were: mouth irritation (46.8 %) and loss of taste (45.2 %). Those more likely to self-report side effects were younger, male, currently smoking (vs quit), vaping for <6 months (vs >1 year), using disposables or cartridges/ pods (vs tanks), using vapes with nicotine (vs without nicotine), using menthol/mint flavour (vs sweet flavour), currently smoking (vs quit), believing vaping causes various diseases (e.g., heart disease), and believing that vaping is equally/more harmful than smoking.

Conclusion: Negative side effects associated with NVP use were rare and mainly minor in all four countries. Shorter duration of vaping, concurrent smoking while vaping and perceptions of greater vaping harms relative to smoking were associated with more reported negative side effects attributed to vaping.

Citation

Gravely, S., Novotny, T., Cummings, K.M., East, K.A., Hyland, A., Driezen, P., Hoek, J., Morphett, K., Sellars, D., O’Connor, Quah, A.C.K., Fong, G.T., Gartner, C.E. (2024). Opposition to banning cigarette filters and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful among adults who smoke: Findings from the 2022 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, [Published online Nov 16, doi: doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae270].

Abstract

Introduction: In line with historical tobacco industry marketing claims, many consumers perceive cigarettes with filters as less harmful than cigarette without filters. However, scientific evidence indicates that cigarette filters do not reduce the risks associated with smoking. We examined opposition to banning the sale of cigarettes with filters, beliefs about whether removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful, and whether this belief is associated with opposition to banning filters among adults who smoke cigarettes from four high-income countries.

Methods: Data are from 2,980 adults who smoke cigarettes and participated in the 2022 ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States (US). Weighted descriptives estimated opposition to a cigarette filter ban and the belief that removing filters makes cigarettes ‘much more’, ‘a little more’, ‘not more’ harmful, or ‘don’t know’. Adjusted regression analyses examined the association between opposition to banning filters (vs. support/don’t know) and the belief that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful (vs. otherwise).

Results: Across all counties, 69.3% opposed banning filters, 11.5% of respondents supported banning filters, and 19.1% did not know (main effect for country differences: p=0.001). Country differences remained significant after adjusting for covariates (p=0.047), with adults who smoke in Australia and the US being significantly more likely to oppose a filter ban than those in England. Canada did not differ significantly from any of the countries. Nearly half (45.9%) believe that removing filters would make cigarettes much more harmful, 28.6% reported a little more harmful, 15.3% were unsure, and 10.2% reported not more harmful (country differences: p=0.002). Country differences were no longer significant after adjustment (p=0.18). Believing that removing filters makes cigarettes much more harmful was strongly associated with opposing a filter ban (78.5%) (vs. otherwise: 62.1%, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Across all four countries, three-quarters of adults who smoke erroneously believe that removing filters would make cigarettes more harmful, and believing that doing so would make cigarettes much more harmful was the strongest predictor of opposing a filter ban.

Citation

Borland, R., Dhungel, B., Gartner, C.E., Fong, G.T., Hyland, A., Cummings, K.M., East, K.A. (2024). How is heated tobacco product use described by people who use them daily. Tobacco Control, [Published online Nov 1, doi: doi:10.1136/tc-2024-058969].

Abstract

Heated tobacco products (HTPs) heat tobacco, usually in the form of a stick of compacted, reconstituted tobacco rather than burning it, to produce an aerosol that contains nicotine and other tobacco constituents. In countries where these products are marketed, prevalence has increased, most notably Japan. HTPs deliver lower levels of toxicants than conventional cigarette smoke and are promoted as harm- reduced alternatives to smoking. It is unclear how HTP users describe the act of inhaling the aerosol generated. One qualitative study among adult HTP users found considerable confusion as to what term was appropriate, and although the term ‘smoking’ was commonly used, they resisted being labelled as ‘smokers’.

The continuing uncertainty about terms reinforces existing concerns about product classification, highlighting the need to clearly communicate category differences when asking about product use. We do this in ITC surveys. Accurate classification is particularly important as these products have different risk profiles and/or are subject to different regulatory requirements.

Citation

Gravely, S., Smith, T.T., Toll, B.A., Ashley, D.L., Driezen, P., Levy, D.T., Quah, A.C.K., Fong, G.T., Cummings, K.M. (2024). Electronic nicotine delivery system flavors, devices, and brands used by adults in the United States who smoke and formerly smoked in 2022. Preventive Medicine Reports, [Published online Oct 16, doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102905]

Abstract

Objective: This study estimated prevalence of current electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) used by US adults who smoked cigarettes or formerly smoked in 2022 and assessed ENDS flavors, devices, and brands used most often.

Methods: Data are from the 2022 US ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey. Respondents were recruited from a web panel of a nationally representative sample of US adults ages 18+ who smoked, formerly smoked, and/or vaped ENDS. Using weighted data, we estimated prevalence of current vaping among adults who smoke or formerly smoked (N = 2,016). Among the subset who vaped (n = 554), we assessed flavors and devices used most often. Using unweighted data, we assessed the frequency (count) of reported brands used most often.

Results: In 2022, 22.0 % of US adults who smoked or formerly smoked were vaping at least monthly. A significantly higher proportion of adults who formerly smoked and/or were younger (18–39) were vaping than adults who were smoking and/or were older (40+) (both p < 0.001). Tank devices were used most often (34.7 %), followed by disposables (27.4 %), pre-filled pods/cartridges (23.0 %), and refillable pods/cartridges (14.9 %). The five most commonly used flavors were fruit (33.9 %), tobacco (20.1 %), menthol (12.2 %), candy/sweets (10.8 %), and mixed ice flavors (10.0 %). The top 5 brands were JUUL, Smok, Vuse, Geekvape, and Blu.

Conclusions: In 2022, a majority of adults who smoked cigarettes or who had quit smoking used a variety of flavors and devices that go beyond the choices that FDA currently has authorized for sale.

Citation

Hammond, D., Reid, J.L., Burkhalter, R., East, K.A. (2024). Use of disposable e-cigarettes among youth who vape in Canada, England and the United States: Repeat cross-sectional surveys, 2017-2023. Addiction, [Published online Jul 1, doi: 10.1111/add.16596].

Abstract

Aims: To measure changes over time (between 2017 and 2023) in disposable e-cigarette use and popular brands among youth in Canada, England and the United States (US) who vaped.

Design: Nine waves of repeat cross-sectional data from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC) Youth Tobacco and Vaping Survey.

Setting: Online surveys conducted in Canada, England and the US between 2017 and 2023.

Participants: Youth aged 16 to 19 years who had vaped in the past 30 days (n=19 710).

Measurements: Usual type (disposable, cartridge/pod, tank) and brand of e-cigarette used; covariates sex at birth, age, race/ethnicity, cigarette smoking status, vaping on less than or equal to 20 of the past 30 days.

Findings: In 2017, the majority of youth who vaped in the past 30 days reported using refillable tank e-cigarettes, whereas disposable e-cigarettes were the least commonly used product type in Canada (10.0%), England (8.6%) and the US (14.4%). Cartridge/pods overtook tank devices in Canada and the US by 2020; however, by 2023, disposables were the leading type of e-cigarette used by youth who vaped in all three countries (Canada = 58.5%; England = 83.2%; US = 67.3%). The shift to disposables occurred among all socio-demographic groups, with few differences by vaping and smoking status. The percentage of youth who vaped that reported ‘no usual’ brand also decreased substantially from 2017 (29% to 42%) to 2023 (11% to 17%). The rise of disposable e-cigarettes appeared to be driven primarily by individual brands in the US (Puff Bar in 2020/2021, Elf Bar in 2022/2023) and England (Elf Bar in 2022/2023).

Conclusions: The e-cigarette market has evolved rapidly with notable shifts in the types of e-cigarettes used by youth who vape in Canada, England and the United States. Although the timing differed across countries, major shifts in device types appear to be driven by individual brands and were often accompanied by increases in vaping prevalence among youth.

Citation

Le Grande, M., Borland, R., Gravely, S., Cummings, K.M., McNeill, A., Yong, H.H., Gartner, C. (2024). Support for banning sale of smoked tobacco products among adults who smoke: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys (2018-2020). Tobacco Control, [Published online 17 Jun, doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058532].

Abstract

Background: Many people continue to smoke despite strong policies to deter use, thus stronger regulatory measures may be required. In four high-income countries, we examined whether people who smoke would support a total ban on smoked tobacco products under two differing policy scenarios.

Methods: Data were from 14 363 adults (≥18) who smoked cigarettes (≥monthly) and participated in at least one of the 2018, 2020 or 2022 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys in Australia, Canada, England and the USA. In 2018, respondents were asked whether they would support a law that totally bans smoked tobacco if the government provides smoking cessation assistance (Cessation Assistance scenario). In 2020 and 2022, respondents were asked a slightly different question as to whether they would support a law that totally bans smoked tobacco if the government encourages people who smoke to use alternative nicotine products like vaping products and nicotine replacement products instead (substitution scenario). Responses (support vs oppose/don't know) were estimated on weighted data.

Results: Support was greater for the cessation assistance scenario (2018, 36.6%) than the nicotine substitution scenario (2020, 26.9%; 2022, 26.3%, both p<0.0001). In the longitudinal analysis, there was a significant scenario by country interaction effect with lower support in Canada, the USA and Australia under the substitution scenario than in the cessation scenario, but equivalent levels in England under both scenarios. The strongest correlates of support under both scenarios were planning to quit smoking within 6 months, wanting to quit smoking 'a lot' and recent use of nicotine replacement therapy.

Conclusions: Opposition to banning smoked tobacco predominates among people who smoke, but less with a cessation assistance scenario than one encouraging nicotine substitution. Wanting to quit a lot was the strongest indicator of support.

Citation

Brose, L.S., Reid, J.L., Robson, D., McNeill, A., & Hammond, D. (2024). Associations between vaping and self-reported respiratory symptoms in young people in Canada, England and the US. BMC Medicine, 22(1):213, 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03428-6.

Abstract

Background: Prevalence of youth nicotine vaping has increased, heightening concerns around negative health effects. This study aimed to compare self-reported respiratory symptoms among youth by vaping behaviours.

Methods: Participants (n = 39,214) aged 16-19 from the 2020 and 2021 International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC) Youth Tobacco and Vaping Surveys (Canada, England, US). Weighted multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between reporting any of five respiratory symptoms in the past week (shortness of breath, wheezing, chest pain, phlegm, cough) and: past 30-day smoking and/or vaping; lifetime/current vaping. Among past-30-day vapers (n = 4644), we assessed associations between symptoms and vaping frequency, use of nicotine salts, usual flavour and device type(s).

Results: Overall, 27.8% reported experiencing any of the five respiratory symptoms. Compared with youth who had only vaped, those who had only smoked had similar odds of symptoms [adjusted odds ratio, OR (95% confidence interval, CI): 0.97 (0.85-1.10)], those who both smoked and vaped had higher odds [1.26 (1.12-1.42)], and those who had done neither, lower odds [0.67 (0.61-0.72)]. Compared with those who had never vaped, past use, experimentation and current regular or occasional use were all associated with higher odds. Reporting usually using nicotine salts was associated with higher odds of symptoms [1.43 (1.22-1.68)] than non-salt but was often uncertain. Compared with tobacco flavour (including with menthol), menthol/mint and sweets flavours were associated with similar odds; fruit [1.44 (1.07-1.93)], multiple [1.76 (1.30-2.39)] and 'other' [2.14 (1.45-3.16)] flavours with higher odds. All device types were associated with similar odds.

Conclusions: Among youth, vaping was associated with increased reporting of past-week respiratory symptoms. Among those who vaped, some flavour types and potentially nicotine salts were associated with respiratory symptoms.

Citation

Snelling, S., Yong, H.H., Kasza, K.A., Borland, R. (2024). Does alcohol consumption elevate smoking relapse risk of people who used to smoke? Differences by duration of smoking abstinence. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 159(209260), doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209260

Abstract

Background: Past research indicates dual users of tobacco and alcohol find it harder to quit smoking and may be more likely to relapse. This study investigated whether post-quit alcohol use predicted smoking relapse among ex-smokers, and whether this relationship varied by length of smoking abstinence.

Method: The study included 1064 ex-smokers (18+ years) from Canada (n = 340), US (n = 314), England (n = 261), and Australia (n = 149) who participated in the 2018 and 2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey, and we conducted analyses using multivariable logistic regression. We assessed alcohol consumption in 2018 using AUDIT-C and coded as never/low, moderate or heavy level and used alcohol consumption to predict smoking status in 2020.

Results: Overall 26 % and 21 % of ex-smokers consumed alcohol at a moderate and heavy level, respectively. Compared to never/low alcohol consumption, risk of smoking relapse among those who consumed alcohol at a moderate level was significantly lower within the first year of abstinence (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI = 0.14–0.81, p = 0.015) but higher thereafter (OR = 2.44, 95 % CI = 1.13–5.23, p = 0.023). The pattern of results was similar for those who consumed alcohol at a heavy level.

Conclusions: Overall, baseline alcohol consumption of ex-smokers did not predict their smoking relapse risk. As expected, risk differed by smoking abstinence duration. However, the pattern was unexpected among the short-term quitters as the subgroup who drank moderately/heavily had lower relapse risk than their counterparts who never drink or at low level, underscoring the need to replicate this unexpected finding

Citation

Gomes, M.N., Reid, J.L., Rynard, V.L., East, K.A., Goniewicz, M.L., Piper, M.E., Hammond, D. (2024). Comparison of indicators of dependence for vaping and smoking: Trends between 2017 and 2022 among youth in Canada, England, and the United States. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, ntae060, doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae060.

Abstract

Introduction: The current study sought to examine trends in indicators of dependence for youth vaping and smoking during a period of rapid evolution in the e-cigarette market.

Methods: Data are from repeat cross-sectional online surveys conducted between 2017 and 2022 among youth aged 16-19 in Canada, England, and the USA. Participants were 23,145 respondents who vaped and/or smoked in the past 30 days. Four dependence indicators were assessed for smoking and vaping (perceived addiction, frequent strong urges, time to first use after waking, days used in past month) and two for vaping only (use events per day, E-cigarette Dependence Scale). Regression models examined differences by survey wave and country, adjusting for sex, age, race, and exclusive/dual use.

Results: All six indicators of dependence increased between 2017 and 2022 among youth who vaped in the past 30 days (p<.001 for all). For example, more youth reported strong urges to vape at least most days in 2022 than in 2017 (Canada: 26.5% to 53.4%; England: 25.5% to 45.4%; USA: 31.6% to 50.3%). In 2017, indicators of vaping dependence were substantially lower than for smoking; however, by 2022, youth vaping was associated with a greater number of days used in the past month (Canada, USA), shorter time to first use (all countries), and a higher likelihood of frequent strong urges (Canada, USA) compared to youth smoking.

Conclusions: From 2017 to 2022, indicators of vaping dependence increased substantially. By 2022, vaping dependence indices were comparable to those of smoking.

Implications: Indicators of vaping dependence among youth have increased substantially since 2017 to levels that are comparable to cigarette dependence among youth who smoke. Future research should examine factors underlying the increase in dependence among youth who vape, including changes to the nicotine profile and design of e-cigarette products.

Citation

He, Y., Liber, A.C., Driezen, P., Thompson, M.E., Levy, D.T., Fong, G.T., Cummings, K.M., Shang, C. (2024). How do users compare the costs between nicotine vaping products and cigarettes? Findings from the 2016-2020 International Tobacco Control United States surveys. Addiction, 119(5), 885-897. doi: 10.1111/add.16425.

Abstract

Background and aims: Nicotine vaping products (NVPs) can potentially help adult tobacco users quit smoking. This study evaluated how adult consumers compare the costs between NVPs and cigarettes.

Method: We used data from the US arm of the 2016-2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) surveys to perform a multinomial logit model with two-way fixed effects to measure how perceived cost comparisons are associated with NVP and cigarette taxes, use patterns, NVP device types and individual sociodemographic factors.

Results: Higher cigarette taxes are associated with a greater likelihood of perceiving NVPs and cigarettes as costing the same for the overall population and among people who exclusively smoke, and a lower likelihood of perceiving NVPs as more expensive among people who exclusively vape, compared with lower cigarette taxes. Pre-filled cartridge and tank users are more likely to perceive NVPs as less expensive than cigarettes, compared with people who use other types of NVPs. The associations between taxes and perceived cost comparison were more pronounced among males, younger and low-income populations.

Conclusions: Higher cigarette taxes are associated with perceived financial incentives for nicotine vaping products (NVPs) over cigarettes, whereas NVP taxes are not associated with perceived cost comparison between NVPs and cigarettes.

Keywords: cigarette; cost comparison; device type; excise tax; nicotine vaping product (NVP); use frequency.

Citation

East, K.A., Taylor, E., Simonavicius, E., Nottage, M., Burkhalter, R., Brose, L.S., Wackowski, O.A., Liber, A.C., McNeill, A., Hammond, D. (2024). Noticing education campaigns or public health messages about vaping among youth in the US, Canada, and England from 2018 to 2022. Health Education Research, 39(1), 12-28. doi: 10.1093/her/cyad044.

Abstract

Public health campaigns have the potential to correct vaping misperceptions. However, campaigns highlighting vaping harms to youth may increase misperceptions that vaping is equally/more harmful than smoking. Vaping campaigns have been implemented in the United States and Canada since 2018 and in England since 2017 but with differing focus: youth vaping prevention (United States/Canada) and smoking cessation (England). We therefore examined country differences and trends in noticing vaping campaigns among youth and, using 2022 data only, perceived valence of campaigns and associations with harm perceptions. Seven repeated cross-sectional surveys of 16–19 year-olds in United States, Canada and England (2018–2022, n = 92 339). Over half of youth reported noticing vaping campaigns, and noticing increased from August 2018 to February 2020 (United States: 55.2% to 74.6%, AOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.18-1.24; Canada: 52.6% to 64.5%, AOR = 1.13, 1.11-1.16; England: 48.0% to 53.0%, AOR = 1.05, 1.02-1.08) before decreasing (Canada) or plateauing (England/United States) to August 2022. Increases were most pronounced in the United States, then Canada. Noticing was most common on websites/social media, school and television/radio. In 2022 only, most campaigns were perceived to negatively portray vaping and this was associated with accurately perceiving vaping as less harmful than smoking among youth who exclusively vaped (AOR = 1.46, 1.09-1.97). Consistent with implementation of youth vaping prevention campaigns in the United States and Canada, most youth reported noticing vaping campaigns/messages, and most were perceived to negatively portray vaping.

Citation

Li, L., Borland, R., Le Grande, M., & Gartner, C. (2024). Future nicotine use preferences of current cigarette smokers: Findings from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Drug and Alcohol Review. 43(2), 359-370. doi: 10.1111/dar.13791.

Abstract

Introduction: Consumer preferences should be important factors that are considered when developing health policies and interventions. This paper examines the prevalence of, and factors associated with, consumer preferences regarding smoking behaviour 1 to 2 years in the future.

Methods: At least weekly cigarette smokers in the 2020 wave of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey (USA, Canada, England and Australia) (N=8642) were asked if they preferred to continue to smoke or to quit with or without an alternative nicotine product (ANP) over the next 1–2 years.

Results: Country-specific weighted data showed 21.5% preferred to continue smoking and 8.0% were uncertain, leaving 70.6% preferring to quit: 13.7% using an ANP and 56.9% completely quitting nicotine. Apart from interest in quitting, the main predictors of preferring to quit were history of vaping, being aged 55 and over, smoking weekly, worrying about smoking harms, regretting starting and believing vaping is less harmful relative to smoking. Among those preferring to quit, preferring to use ANPs in future was very strongly associated with current vaping (especially daily), being younger, living in England, reporting strong urges to smoke, believing vaping is much less harmful than smoking, and not strongly regretting starting to smoke, and not wanting to quit.

Discussion and Conclusions: A significant minority of smokers preferred not to quit, at least in the next year or two. Both interest in quitting and preference for ANPs over complete cessation were associated with similar covariates, including interest in vaping.

Citation

Fairman, R.T., Cho, Y., Popova, L., Cummings, K.M., Smith, T., Fong, G.T., Gravely, S., Borland, R., McNeill, A., Gartner, C., Morphett, K., Thrasher, J.F. (2023). Support for nicotine reduction in cigarettes: Findings from the 2016 and 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Tobacco Control, doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058128.

Abstract

Introduction: The USA and New Zealand have sought to establish a product standard to set a maximum nicotine level for cigarettes to reduce their addictiveness. This study examined support for very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) in Australia, Canada, England and the USA between 2016 and 2020.

Methods: Repeated cross-sectional data were analysed from participants who currently smoke, formerly smoked or vaped and/or currently vape in the 2016 (n=11?150) and/or 2020 (n=5432) International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Respondents were asked if they would support a law that reduces the amount of nicotine in cigarettes to make them less addictive. Adjusted and weighted logistic regression analyses estimated the prevalence and predictors of support, such as country, age, sex, education, income, race and smoking/vaping status for VLNCs (support vs oppose/do not know).

Results: A majority of respondents supported a VLNC law, with support highest in Canada (69%; 2016 and 2020 combined), followed by England (61%), Australia (60%) and the USA (58%). Overall, support decreased from 62% in 2016 to 59% in 2020 (p=0.004), which did not differ by country. Levels of support differed by smoking/vaping status, where those who exclusively smoked daily showed the lowest level of support (59%) and those who exclusively vaped non-daily had the highest level of support (72%).

Conclusion: More than half of respondents in all four countries—including those who smoked daily—supported a hypothetical VLNC standard to render cigarettes less addictive. It is important to examine if support is sustained after policies are implemented.

Citation

Gravely, S., Driezen, P., Shahab, L., McClure, E., Hyland, A., Cummings, K.M., East, K.A., Chan, C.K.G., Walsh, H., Benowitz, N.L., Gartner, C., Fong, G.T., Quah, A.C.K., Smith, D.M. (2023). Associations of cannabis use, high-risk alcohol use, and depressive symptomology with motivation and attempts to quit cigarette smoking among adults: Findings from the 2020 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, doi: 10.1007/s11469-023-01214-8.

Abstract

This study assessed independent and interaction effects of the frequency of cannabis use, high-risk alcohol use, and depressive symptomology on motivation and attempts to quit cigarette smoking among adults who regularly smoked. Cross-sectional data are from the 2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey and included 7044 adults (ages 18 + years) who smoked cigarettes daily in Australia (n = 1113), Canada (n = 2069), England (n = 2444), and the United States (USA) (n = 1418). Among all respondents, 33.1% of adults reported wanting to quit smoking “a lot,” and 29.1% made a past-year quit attempt. Cannabis use was not significantly associated with either outcome (both p ≥ 0.05). High-risk alcohol use was significantly associated with decreased odds of motivation to quit (p = 0.02) and making a quit attempt (p = 0.004). Depressive symptomology was associated with increased odds for both outcomes (both p < 0.001). There were no significant 2- or 3-way interactions between cannabis use, alcohol consumption, and depressive symptomatology. Overall, just over a quarter of adults who smoked daily reported making a recent quit attempt, and most were not highly motivated to quit. Longitudinal research should investigate whether there are linkages between cannabis use, risky alcohol consumption, and/or depression on successful long-term smoking cessation.

Citation

Roberson, A., Cummings, K.M., Reid, J.L., Burkhalter, R., Gravely, S., East, K.A., Thrasher, J.F., Hammond, D. (2023). Trends in e-cigarette and tobacco cigarette purchasing behaviors by youth in the United States, Canada, and England, 2017-2022. International Journal of Public Health, 68, doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1606234.

Abstract

Objectives: This paper describes trends in youth e-cigarette (EC) and tobacco cigarette (TC) purchasing behaviors in Canada, England, and the United States (US) in relationship to changing minimum legal age (MLA)

Methods: Data are from eight cross-sectional online surveys among national samples of 16 to 19 year olds in Canada, England, and the US conducted from 2017 to 2022 (N = 104,467). Average wave percentage change in EC and TC purchasing prevalence and purchase locations were estimated using Joinpoint regressions.

Results: EC purchasing increased between 2017 and 2022, although the pattern of change differed by country. EC purchasing plateaued in 2019 for the US and in 2020 for Canada, while increasing through 2022 for England. TC purchasing declined sharply in the US, with purchasing from traditional retail locations declining, while purchasing from social sources increased. Vape shops were the most common location for EC purchasing, although declining in England and the US.

Conclusion: Trends in EC and TC purchasing trends in the US are consistent with the expected impact of the federal MLA law increasing the legal age to 21 years in December 2019.

Citation

Kyriakos, C.N., Chung-Hall, J., Craig, L.V., Fong, G.T. (2023). Optimising a product standard for banning menthol and other flavors in tobacco products: Implications for the United States and other countries. Tobacco Control, doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058174.

Abstract

In this paper, we highlight key issues that policymakers should consider when developing a product standard banning menthol and other flavors in tobacco products based on research evidence and experiences learned from other countries. A flavor product standard may be optimized by (1) having a clear and comprehensive definition of flavor that includes a complete ban on additives that have flavor properties and/or evoke sensory/cooling effects (i.e., menthol analogues and synthetic coolants that stimulate the cooling receptor of the brain) rather than only as a “characterizing flavor”, and (2) applying the standard to all tobacco product categories as well as all components or parts of the tobacco product (i.e., the tobacco, filter, wrapper, or paper), including separate flavorings that can be added to the product.

Citation

Hammond, D., Reid, J.L. (2023). Trends in vaping and nicotine product use among youth in Canada, England and the USA between 2017 and 2022: evidence to inform policy. Tobacco Control, doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058241.

Abstract

Background: Preventing uptake of nicotine products among youth remains a central objective of tobacco control policy. Comparing trends in the use of nicotine across countries provides an opportunity to identify emergent product trends and to evaluate ‘natural experiments’ in policies.

Methods: Repeat cross-sectional data were analysed from eight waves of the International Tobacco Control Youth Tobacco and Vaping Survey, conducted between 2017 and 2022. Non-probability samples of youth aged 16–19 years in Canada, England and the USA (N=104?473) completed online surveys including measures on vaping, smoking and use of other nicotine products. This paper summarises findings across the 5-year period of the study, as part of a comprehensive report on key indicators of youth vaping in the three countries.

Results: The youth nicotine market has rapidly evolved across the three countries, with different patterns of combustible and non-combustible product use in Canada, the USA and England. These changes are primarily attributable to trends in youth vaping: following declines during the initial COVID-19 pandemic period, by 2022, vaping prevalence neared pre-pandemic levels in the USA and Canada, and reached record highs in England. Notable shifts also occurred in the types of vaping products used by youth, including increased use of disposable, nicotine salt-based products. Additional findings are reported on a range of policy-relevant indicators, including for vaping products, promotions and purchasing.

Conclusions: Patterns of nicotine use among youth have rapidly evolved in recent years due to the proliferation of nicotine products, the COVID-19 pandemic and the emerging impact of policy measures.

Citation

King, B., Borland, R., Le Grande, M.R., Diaz, D., O’Connor, R.J. , East, K.A., Taylor, E.V., Gartner, C.E., Yong, H.H. (2023) Associations between smokers’ knowledge of causes of smoking harm and related beliefs and behaviors: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. PLOS ONE 18(10): e0292856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292856

Abstract

Background: Most smokers know that smoking is harmful to health, but less is known about their understanding of what causes the harms. The primary aim was to examine smokers’ perceptions of the relative contributions to smoking-related morbidity from combustion products, nicotine, other substances present in unburned tobacco, and additives. A secondary aim was to evaluate the association of these perceptions with nicotine vaping product use intentions, and quitting motivation/intentions.

Methods: Participants were current smokers and recent ex-smokers from Australia, Canada, England and the United States (N = 12,904, including 8511 daily smokers), surveyed in the 2018 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Respondents reported on how much they thought combustion products, nicotine, chemicals in the tobacco and additives in cigarettes contribute to smoking-related morbidity (none/very little; some but less than half; around half; more than half; all or nearly all of it; don’t know).

Results: Overall, 4% of participants provided estimates for all four component causes that fell within the ranges classified correct, with younger respondents and those from England most likely to be correct. Respondents who rated combustion as clearly more important than nicotine in causing harm (25%) were the least likely to be smoking daily and more likely to have quit and/or to be vaping. Among daily smokers, all four cause estimates were independently related to overall health worry and extent of wanting to quit, but the relative rating of combustion compared to nicotine did not add to prediction. Those who answered ‘don’t know’ to the sources of harm questions and those suggesting very little harm were consistently least interested in quitting.

Conclusions: Most smokers’ knowledge of specific causes of harm is currently inadequate and could impact their informed decision-making ability.

Citation

Cho, A., Scollo, M., Chan, C.K.G., Driezen, P., Hyland, A., Shang, C., Gartner, C. (2023). Tobacco purchasing in Australia during regular tax increases: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project. Tobacco Control, [Published online Aug 31, doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058130].

Abstract

Objective: We examined Australian tobacco purchasing trends, the average self-reported price paid within each purchase type and the association between type of tobacco product purchased and participant characteristics, including quit intentions, between 2007 and 2020.

Methods: We analysed data collected from adults who smoked factory-made and/or roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes in nine waves (2007–2020) of the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project Australia Survey (nsample =5452, nobservations =11 534). The main outcome measures were type of tobacco products purchased: RYO, carton, pack or pouch size and brand segment. Logistic regression, fit using generalised estimating equations, was estimated the association between the outcome and participant characteristics.

Results: The reported price-minimising purchasing patterns increased from 2007 to 2020: any RYO (23.8–43.9%), large-sized pack (2007: 24.0% to 2016: 34.3%); shifting from large-sized to small-sized packs (2020: 37.7%), and economy brand (2007: 37.2% to 2020: 59.3%); shifting from large (2007: 55.8%) to small economy packs (2014: 15.3% to 2020: 48.1%). Individuals with a lower income, a higher nicotine dependence level and no quit intention were more likely to purchase RYO and large-sized packs.

Conclusion: RYO, large-sized packs and products with a low upfront cost (eg, small RYO pouches and small-sized economy brand packs) may appeal to people on low incomes. Australia’s diverse tobacco pack and pouch sizes allow the tobacco industry to influence tobacco purchases. Standardising pack and pouch sizes may reduce some price-related marketing and especially benefit people who have a low income, are highly addicted and have no quit intention.

Citation

Chung-Hall, J., Craig, L.V., Kyriakos, C.N., Fong, G.T. (2023). U.S. Food and Drug Administration must ban menthol cigarettes without delay: Lessons from other countries. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(6), 1192-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.001.

Abstract

No abstract.